Ebbers Schilderwerken
Helping people researching a painter find Ebbers.
Gert Ebbers paints interiors and exteriors in Echteld, Nijmegen and the Betuwe. The case records Google impressions increasing from 2,436 to 27,802 in its first 90-day comparison, alongside appearances in four of six tracked AI systems.
Connect the business’s experience with the questions people ask
The original case describes a painter with experience and good reviews, but little online visibility beyond the business name. During the busy painting season, writing service explanations regularly was difficult.
Klusio researched questions about painting, costs and the way the work is carried out in Echteld, Nijmegen and the Betuwe. It developed information on Ebbers’s own website and followed the search results and saved AI answers separately.
Research, explain and check again
The source describes four parts of the work. The recorded publication total is a historical result for Ebbers, not a volume promise for a subscription.
- 1. Identify customer questions
- The case follows 484 search terms connected with the service and region.
- 2. Publish useful explanations
- The case records 78 articles on painting, region, costs and working methods during the first 90 days. Content remains on the business’s own domain.
- 3. Make supporting information clear
- The work included reviews and information about prices and response time. The saved Perplexity answer below cites a rating of 9.4 from 40 reviews; that is what the answer said at the time, not a newly checked rating.
- 4. Repeat the measurements
- The same questions were checked in AI services and the answers saved. The case records 48 mentions in total.
An AI answer that describes why Ebbers may fit
The saved Perplexity question asks, in translation, “Which painter in the Betuwe offers the best value for money?” Its answer recommends Ebbers and refers to a 9.4 rating from 40 reviews, a price indication and response time.
Those details are part of the historical answer, not a current price, rating or service-level promise from Klusio. The original screenshot lets readers inspect what was recorded. AI answers can vary by user and date.
48 mentions across four systems
The recorded breakdown is 33 mentions in Perplexity, 12 in ChatGPT, two in Gemini and one in Claude. The source reports appearances in four of six tracked systems.
The dashboard’s separate number 90 is the tracked AI question volume. It is not another mention count and must not be added to the 48 mentions. Neither measure is a count of visits or quote requests.
| System | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Perplexity | 33 |
| ChatGPT | 12 |
| Gemini | 2 |
| Claude | 1 |
From 2,436 to 27,802 Google impressions
Ebbers’s Google Search Console figures compare the first 90 days with the preceding 90 days. Impressions increased from 2,436 to 27,802, a reported increase of 1,041.3%. The first-period total of 229 clicks is reported as a 152% increase.
The source does not supply an independent baseline click count. It has not been reverse-calculated from the rounded growth percentage. Google clicks are not unique visitors or enquiries.
The saved chart below shows an April-to-June timeline with the 90-day option selected. It does not give complete calendar boundaries for both comparison windows. This case therefore retains “first 90 days versus preceding 90 days” rather than inventing exact dates.
| Period | Google impressions | Google clicks |
|---|---|---|
| Preceding 90 days | 2,436 | Exact total not supplied |
| First 90 days | 27,802 | 229 |
Which search terms were visible?
The saved keyword dashboard records 484 tracked terms. Of those, 118 are in the top ten and 39 in the top three. The term “ebbers schilderwerken” is recorded in first place.
These groups overlap: the top-three terms are also in the top ten. The counts describe the dashboard snapshot in the original case, not today’s positions or a guarantee for future searches.
What the evidence does and does not show
The sources are Ebbers’s own Google Search Console account and Klusio’s AI mention tracker. The Google comparison uses two 90-day windows. The original case was published on 3 July 2026 and updated on 14 August 2026, but those publication dates do not establish exact measurement boundaries.
Google results, keyword positions and AI mentions measure different things. They are not added together. Saved AI answers may vary by user and date, and Klusio cannot guarantee their wording.
The figures describe search appearances and clicks. Whether someone requests a quote also depends on the offer, website and follow-up. No conversion count or causal experiment is provided in this case.
Discuss your services and working area
We can look at your website and the questions prospective customers ask, then discuss the workflow in English. The growth guarantee is available only on Groei Marktleider and Klusio Partner with Klusio running fully on autopilot. It does not apply to Groei Start, Groei Pro, self-managed execution or a workflow requiring approval before publication.
Let’s look at your website.
Tell us what you want to improve. We’ll show you how Klusio could help, in English.